Two Features. One Integrated Approach. Complete Capacity Building.

Structure for Collaborative Problem-Solving

What it does:

Gives instructional leaders a structured framework to activate small teacher teams (3-8 teachers) to solve specific instructional challenges in focused 2-8 week cycles.

The platform generates research-backed action plans, facilitation guides, and reflection protocols—so teams can diagnose challenges, test solutions, and build permanent capacity.

Built on collective teacher efficacy (1.39 effect size—the highest in education research).

Coach-Led Capacity Building for Difficult Concepts

What it's for:

When teams identify challenges involving difficult concepts—photosynthesis, algebraic thinking, historical context—and teachers say:

"My students have zero background knowledge. They shut down before we even start."

How do you help teachers create entry points to understanding?

What it does:

Spark Curiosity AI Coach helps instructional coaches and administrators generate micro-inquiry prompts that build conceptual understanding and community BEFORE new content is introduced.

This is NOT a tool teachers use independently.

This is a coaching methodology you model for teachers.

The Coach-Led Implementation Process:

Step 1: Teachers Identify Difficult Topics
During team cycles or coaching conversations, teachers pinpoint concepts where students lack entry points

Step 2: Coach Generates Curiosity Prompts
You input the concept and student context into AI. Platform generates 3-5 thought-provoking questions that:

Activate prior knowledge (even when limited)
Build curiosity about WHY this matters
Connect abstract concepts to students' lived experiences
Create collaborative entry points for whole class

Step 3: Coach Facilitates in Classrooms
You model the method by facilitating prompts across multiple classrooms. Teachers observe how students respond, how to navigate discussion, how to build conceptual bridges.

Step 4: Team Discusses Impact
During team meetings, discuss:

Which prompts sparked the most curiosity?
How did conceptual understanding shift?
What did we learn about creating entry points?

Step 5: Teachers Internalize the Method
After observing coached facilitation 2-3 times, teachers begin creating their own curiosity prompts—WITHOUT AI. They've learned the approach.

Result: Permanent capacity. Not tool dependency.

Example in Action:

During a Team Cycle on science comprehension:

Teachers identify: "Students shut down when we introduce photosynthesis—they have no framework for 'energy transformation'"

Coach inputs to Spark Curiosity AI:

"7th grade students learning photosynthesis. Most have never thought about where plants get energy or how energy changes form."

AI generates curiosity prompts:

"Have you ever wondered why plants are green instead of purple?"
"If you could follow energy from the sun to your lunch, what path would it take?"
"Why do you think plants can survive without eating, but we can't?"

Coach visits 3 classrooms over 2 weeks:

Facilitates 10-minute discussions using these prompts
Teachers observe student engagement, conceptual connections, discussion flow
Coach models how to navigate confusion, build on student ideas, create bridges

Team reflection meeting:

"Which questions built the most conceptual bridges?"
"How did the discussion change students' readiness for photosynthesis?"
"What patterns did we notice about curiosity-building?"

3 weeks later:

One teacher creates own prompts for cell division (no AI needed)
Another adapts method for math (fractions as "number transformations")
Team has internalized approach to creating conceptual entry points

Capacity built. Method transferred. Subscription no longer needed.

Collaborative Structure + Coached Methods = Permanent Capacity

Team Cycles provide the structure:

Regular 2-8 week cycles give teams time to identify challenges, test strategies, reflect on results

Spark Curiosity AI provides the coaching tool:
When challenges involve difficult concepts, coaches model effective curiosity-building methods

Together, they create compounding capacity:

Month 1-2: Team 1 identifies reading comprehension challenge. Coach models curiosity-building for complex texts. Teachers observe method.

Month 3-4: Team 2 identifies math challenge. Teachers from Team 1 now create their own curiosity prompts (no AI). Coach supports refinement.

Month 5-6: Team 3 identifies science challenge. Multiple teachers now model curiosity methods for each other. Coach facilitates reflection.

By end of year: School has 15+ teachers who can create conceptual entry points independently. Method has spread. Capacity has compounded.

You didn't rent a tool. You built institutional expertise.

Built on What Works

Lead Spark Team is grounded in three research foundations:

1. Collective Teacher Efficacy (1.39 Effect Size)

According to John Hattie's meta-analysis of 1,400+ studies, collective teacher efficacy has the highest impact of any educational intervention.

1.39 effect size = 3+ years of student growth in a single school year.

When teachers collaborate on real challenges with THEIR students, they build competence, confidence, and capacity to solve the next challenge themselves.

2. Inquiry-Based Learning & Conceptual Understanding

Research on inquiry-based learning shows that when students activate prior knowledge, make connections, and generate questions from genuine curiosity—before content introduction—they engage more deeply and transfer learning more effectively.

Spark Curiosity AI helps coaches facilitate this approach systematically.

3. Coached Implementation > Tool Access

Studies on professional development consistently show:

Teachers who OBSERVE modeled practice and DISCUSS implementation with coaches internalize methods
Teachers who receive tools without coaching rarely sustain effective use

Coached implementation builds capacity. Tool access creates dependency.

LeadSpark Team is designed around coached implementation—not independent tool use.

Built for Instructional Leaders—Not Individual Teachers

Lead Spark Team is designed for the people who build capacity in schools:

✅ Who Gets Platform Access (4-6 Licenses Per School):

Principals & Assistant Principals
Activate teams, facilitate cycles, model curiosity methods, build school-wide capacity

Instructional Coaches
Support multiple teams, facilitate across classrooms, help teachers internalize approaches

Teacher Leaders & Department Heads
Model methods for their teams, mentor newer teachers, scale effective practices

Master Teachers (When Coaching Others)
Demonstrate curiosity-building, support peers, build capacity in their departments

❌ Who Does NOT Get Platform Access:

Individual classroom teachers using tools independently

Why? Because that creates tool dependency, not permanent capacity.

Teachers participate in team cycles, observe coached facilitation, learn methods—but they don't log into the platform independently to generate AI prompts.

The goal: Teachers eventually create their own curiosity prompts WITHOUT AI.

The Result:

Year 1: 4-6 instructional leaders use platform to support 20-30 teachers
Year 2: Those 20-30 teachers can now model methods for 40+ more teachers
Year 3: Capacity has scaled to 60+ teachers—most creating methods independently

Sustainable. Scalable. Permanent.

Everything You Need in One Annual License

✅ Team Improvement Cycles

Unlimited team activations throughout the year
4-6 instructional leader licenses (principals, APs, coaches, teacher leaders)
Research-backed practice library (continually updated)
Auto-generated facilitation guides (launch, check-in, reflection protocols)
Team Cycle Library (document what works across your school)

✅ Spark Curiosity AI Coach

Unlimited AI-generated curiosity prompts
For coach-led implementation (not independent teacher use)
Strategic use when teams face difficult concepts
Methodology training included

✅ Training & Support

90-minute virtual onboarding: "Activate Your First Team + Model Curiosity Methods"
Email support (24-hour response time)
Monthly product updates
Implementation guides and coaching best practices

✅ Data You Own

Export all team cycle data
Keep all materials you create
No data lock-in (it's yours forever)

Try It First. Build Capacity. Then Decide.

We know instructional leaders need to see capacity building before committing to annual contracts.

That's why we offer a 3-month pilot — test the platform, activate teams, model methods, see results. Then decide.

3-Month Pilot Pricing (March-May 2026):

Small Schools (fewer than 500 students):

Pilot investment: $1,000
What's included: Everything below ↓

Medium Schools (500-1,000 students):

Pilot investment: $1,500
What's included: Everything below ↓

Large Schools (more than 1,000 students):

Pilot investment: $2,000
What's included: Everything below ↓

What's Included in Your 3-Month Pilot:

✓ Full Platform Access

Team Improvement Cycles (unlimited activations)
Spark Curiosity AI Coach (coach-led implementation)
4-6 instructional leader licenses (principals, APs, coaches, teacher leaders)

✓ Active Capacity Building

Activate 2-3 teacher teams
Complete 1-2 full improvement cycles (2-8 weeks each)
Model curiosity methods across multiple classrooms
Help teachers internalize approaches

✓ Intensive Support

90-minute virtual onboarding: "Activate Your First Team"
Weekly check-ins with Kampus Insights team (March-May)
Email support with 24-hour response time
Troubleshooting and implementation coaching

✓ Resources & Training

Research-backed practice library
Auto-generated facilitation guides
Spark Curiosity coaching methodology training
Team Cycle Library (document your progress)

✓ Community Access

Join monthly pilot school roundtables
Connect with other instructional leaders
Early access to July 2026 conference planning

Timeline: March-May 2026

At the end of 3 months, decide whether to continue. No penalties if you walk away.

After Your Pilot: Year 1 Annual Renewal

If you're seeing capacity building (and we're confident you will), continue with a full annual license at 40% off Year 1.

Small Schools (fewer than 500 students):

Standard price: $5,000/year
Your Year 1 price (40% off): $3,000/year
You save: $2,000

Medium Schools (500-1,000 students):

Standard price: $7,500/year
Your Year 1 price (40% off): $4,500/year
You save: $3,000

Large Schools (more than 1,000 students):

Standard price: $10,000/year
Your Year 1 price (40% off): $6,000/year
You save: $4,000

Your 40% discount is locked for Year 1. After Year 1, pricing adjusts to standard rates (or Title I rates if eligible).

Title I Schools Receive Special Pricing:

We're committed to educational equity. Schools serving students who need the most shouldn't be priced out of capacity-building tools.

3-Month Pilot Pricing for Title I Schools:

Small Schools: $750 (25% off standard pilot price)
Medium Schools: $1,125 (25% off standard pilot price)
Large Schools: $1,500 (25% off standard pilot price)

Annual Renewal Pricing for Title I Schools:

Small Schools: $3,750/year
Medium Schools: $5,625/year
Large Schools: $7,500/year

Eligibility: Schools receiving federal Title I funding. Verification required during enrollment.

Compare the Investment:

Option 1: Hire a Consultant Firm

Annual cost: $15,000-$25,000
What you get: One-time workshop or coaching engagement
When it ends: 3-6 months (when consultant leaves)
What stays: Nothing — expertise walks out the door
Next year: Start over, spend another $15K-25K

Option 2: Buy AI Teacher Tools

Annual cost: $2,000-$5,000
What you get: Tool access for teachers to use independently
When it ends: As long as you keep paying subscription
What stays: Nothing — capacity ends when subscription ends
Next year: Keep paying or lose all capacity

Option 3: Lead Spark Team

Annual cost: $5,000-$10,000 (Title I: $3,750-$7,500)
What you get: Complete platform for building permanent capacity through coached implementation
When it ends: Subscription ends, but capacity stays — teachers solve challenges independently
What stays: Methods, approaches, institutional knowledge, collaborative culture
Next year: Capacity compounds — teams solve new challenges faster

Total 3-Year Comparison:

Consultant approach: $45K-75K spent, capacity resets each year
AI tool approach: $6K-15K spent, no capacity if you stop
Lead Spark Team: $15K-30K spent, permanent capacity even if you stop

Optional: We Can Facilitate For You

Virtual Facilitation Services

Not ready to facilitate team cycles or model curiosity methods yourself? We'll do it for you while building your internal capacity.

What we provide:

Live virtual facilitation of team meetings (Launch, Check-In, Reflection)
Modeled curiosity-building facilitation in your classrooms
Coaching debrief sessions to help you take over facilitation

Investment: $1,500-$2,500 per team cycle

Best for:

First-time users wanting hands-on support
Schools launching multiple simultaneous teams
Districts building coach capacity

Premium AI Video Tier (Coming 2027)

Year 2 feature: AI-generated PD videos customized to each team's action plan.

What you'll get:

Short (5-10 min) videos explaining research-backed strategies your team is testing
Reduces prep time by 50%
Teams arrive at meetings already informed

Grounded in a Proven Framework

LeadSpark Team is built on the methodology from The Question Driven Principal—a research-backed approach to administrator-led instructional improvement.

The framework helps school leaders:

Turn curiosity into action
Activate teacher ownership
Build collective efficacy
Create lasting change

Now that framework lives in a platform designed for daily use.

Build Capacity That Lasts Beyond Any Subscription

Your teachers are capable with your support

You don't need to rent consultants.

You don't need to create tool dependencies.

You need a platform that helps you build permanent capacity.

3-month pilot starts at $1,000.

Limited to 15 schools. Launching March 2026.